Nuclear Waste Series: Is it safe to bury Canada’s used nuclear fuel underground, forever?

Sign opposing proposed plan to bury nuclear waste near Teeswater from October 2024. (Scott Miller/CTV News London)

Jeff Binns is a corrosion scientist with the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO). He's spent years trying to figure out whether Canada's most radioactive nuclear waste can be permanently stored underground, forever.

"We couldn't be more confident that this is a safe system," said Binns.

Binns said the NWMO's plan to move over six million used nuclear fuel bundles (3.3 million currently in storage, 2.8 million more projected at end of Canada's nuclear life cycle) from their above ground temporary storage at Canadian nuclear generating sites to a permanent underground facility employs a multiple barrier system, or a "belts and suspenders approach," as he calls it.

First, 48 radioactive fuel bundles at a time will be moved from their current above ground containers into copper-lined, carbon steel containers or tubes for strength and corrosion protection.

Then, the containers will be sealed in bentonite clay boxes, which will then be backfilled with granular bentonite clay once inside the rock caverns drilled 550-650 metres underground.

Binns said the granular bentonite will swell when wet, ultimately making it harder for water to reach the containers.

"If water can't access the container, the container can't corrode because water is required for that. If the container can't corrode, you can't get access of the environment to the used fuel itself, which means the use fuel can't actually leave the DGR," said Binns.

Conceptual drawing of the proposed layout for Canada's first permanent nuclear waste storage facility. (Source: Nuclear Waste Management Organization)

Binns said 115,000 thousand containers or tubes would be housed in the underground facility, known as a Deep Geological Repository, or DGR.

"A deep geological repository is a passive system where you build the deep geological repository and place the fuel inside it. Then, you backfill the repository and you will have some follow up monitoring, but you are then able to walk away," said Binns.

It's that final part that concerns many opponents of the project – abandonment.

"When you're looking after something, you don't abandon it. You know, you don't leave a baby in the field, walk away from it and say, ‘Stay there.’ It's managed. So, the point is that many people believe that this material is so dangerous that it should not be put beyond human control," said Gordon Edwards, director of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility.

NWMO projections show after all the waste is underground, there will be a 50 to 70 year monitoring period, followed by a 20 to 25 year decommissioning phase, and then the plan is to walk away from the entire underground facility.

Conceptual drawing of the Multiple Barrier System that would be used for Canada's first permanent nuclear waste storage facility. (Source: Nuclear Waste Management Organization)

"The whole concept of abandoning the waste is basically for the convenience of the industry, because they want to walk away from it. They want to eventually say, ‘This is not my problem anymore, this is your problem.’ We believe that that's unethical. It's unscientific, it's unsound, and it's unfair," said Edwards, who joined renowned environmentalist David Suzuki at an event panning the nuclear waste burial plan earlier this month in Teeswater.

But Binns said it's the science and modules they've run that gives him and others confidence that permanent underground storage is the right thing to do.

"The real question we need to ask, is it safe to leave it where it is? And I believe the answer's no, not long term. Like we're talking a million years," said Municipality of South Bruce Mayor Mark Goetz.

"Each level of safety has a very, very low chance of failure in and of itself. And when you stack those up on top of each other, it's just an exceedingly low chance of failure. And we just have an incredible amount of confidence in the safety of the design," said Binns.

In Part 3 of your nuclear waste series, we'll talk about the impending vote, and what happens if less than half of South Bruce's 4311 registered voters cast a ballot in the community's DGR referendum, and what role the Saugeen Ojbway Nation plays in the project's fate.

An example of a used nuclear fuel bundle at the Nuclear Waste Management Organization Demonstration Centre near Oakville in May 2024. (Scott Miller/CTV News London)